Knowledge Management System Of Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes,CAS
Intercomparison of boron isotope and concentration measurements. PartII: Evaluation of results | |
Gonfiantini, R; Tonarini, S; Groning, M | |
2003 | |
发表期刊 | GEOSTANDARDS NEWSLETTER-THE JOURNAL OF GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYSIS
![]() |
ISSN | 0150-5505 |
卷号 | 27期号:1页码:41-57 |
摘要 | The Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse (IGG), on behalf and with the support of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), prepared eight geological materials (three natural waters and five rocks and minerals), intended for a blind interlaboratory comparison of measurements of boron isotopic composition and concentration. The materials were distributed to twenty seven laboratories - virtually all those performing geochemical boron isotope analyses in the world which agreed to participate in the intercomparison exercise. Only fifteen laboratories, however, ultimately submitted the isotopic and/or concentration results they obtained on the intercomparison materials. The results demonstrate that interlaboratory reproducibility is not well reflected by the precision values reported by the individual laboratories and this observation holds true for both boron concentration and isotopic composition. The reasons for the discrepancies include fractionations due to the chemical matrix of materials, relative shift of the zero position on the 51113 scale and a lack of well characterized materials for calibrating absolute boron content measurements. The intercomparison materials are now available at the IAEA (solid materials) and IGG (waters) for future distribution. The Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse (IGG), on behalf and with the support of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), prepared eight geological materials (three natural waters and five rocks and minerals), intended for a blind interlaboratory comparison of measurements of boron isotopic composition and concentration. The materials were distributed to twenty seven laboratories - virtually all those performing geochemical boron isotope analyses in the world which agreed to participate in the intercomparison exercise. Only fifteen laboratories, however, ultimately submitted the isotopic and/or concentration results they obtained on the intercomparison materials. The results demonstrate that interlaboratory reproducibility is not well reflected by the precision values reported by the individual laboratories and this observation holds true for both boron concentration and isotopic composition. The reasons for the discrepancies include fractionations due to the chemical matrix of materials, relative shift of the zero position on the 51113 scale and a lack of well characterized materials for calibrating absolute boron content measurements. The intercomparison materials are now available at the IAEA (solid materials) and IGG (waters) for future distribution. |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://ir.isl.ac.cn/handle/363002/2356 |
专题 | 青海盐湖研究所知识仓储 中国科学院青海盐湖研究所 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gonfiantini, R,Tonarini, S,Groning, M. Intercomparison of boron isotope and concentration measurements. PartII: Evaluation of results[J]. GEOSTANDARDS NEWSLETTER-THE JOURNAL OF GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYSIS,2003,27(1):41-57. |
APA | Gonfiantini, R,Tonarini, S,&Groning, M.(2003).Intercomparison of boron isotope and concentration measurements. PartII: Evaluation of results.GEOSTANDARDS NEWSLETTER-THE JOURNAL OF GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYSIS,27(1),41-57. |
MLA | Gonfiantini, R,et al."Intercomparison of boron isotope and concentration measurements. PartII: Evaluation of results".GEOSTANDARDS NEWSLETTER-THE JOURNAL OF GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYSIS 27.1(2003):41-57. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论